Understanding HNSW - The Algorithm Behind Fast Vector Search
Deep dive into Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphs, the algorithm powering modern vector databases and semantic search applications.
Understanding HNSW: The Algorithm Behind Lightning-Fast Vector Search
Explore the mathematical foundations and real-world applications of Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphs, the backbone of modern vector databases and AI-powered search systems.
Overview
Vector search has become the cornerstone of modern AI applications, from recommendation systems to semantic search and RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines. At the heart of these systems lies a sophisticated algorithm called HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World), which enables lightning-fast similarity searches across millions of high-dimensional vectors.
Vector Search Fundamentals
Understanding how machines find similarities in any data type
HNSW Algorithm
The graph-based approach to approximate nearest neighbor search
Distance Metrics
Cosine similarity, Euclidean distance, and topological approaches
Performance Optimisations
How implementation tricks can achieve 8x performance improvements
What is Vector Search?
The Foundation of Modern AI
Vector search is a method for finding similar items by representing data as high-dimensional numerical vectors and computing distances between them. Unlike traditional keyword-based search, vector search understands semantic meaning and context.
Data Vectorisation
Any type of data can be converted into vectors:
- Text: "The cat sat on the mat" → [0.2, -0.1, 0.8, ..., 0.3]
- Images: Pixel patterns → [0.5, 0.2, -0.3, ..., 0.7]
- Audio: Spectral features → [-0.1, 0.4, 0.9, ..., -0.2]
- User Preferences: Behavioral patterns → [0.6, -0.4, 0.1, ..., 0.8]
import openai
def text_to_vector(text):
response = openai.embeddings.create(
model="text-embedding-3-small",
input=text
)
return response.data[0].embeddingThere are open source embedding models, you can use models from huggingface for example the BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 embedding model which will get most of your work done!
Similarity Through Geometry
Once data is vectorized, similarity becomes a geometric problem. Items with similar meanings or characteristics cluster together in vector space, while dissimilar items remain distant.
Real-world Example:
- "Dog" and "Puppy" vectors: Distance = 0.1 (very similar)
- "Dog" and "Airplane" vectors: Distance = 0.9 (very different)
So further the distance, less likely they hold similar meaning!
The Scale Challenge
Modern applications deal with massive vector datasets:
- OpenAI embeddings: 1,536 dimensions
- Google's Universal Sentence Encoder: 512 dimensions
- CLIP image embeddings: 512-2048 dimensions
- Enterprise knowledge bases: Millions of vectors
Searching through millions of high-dimensional vectors naively requires comparing every vector pair—computationally prohibitive for real-time applications.
Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) Search
The Need for Speed
The Curse of Dimensionality: As dimensions increase, the computational cost of exact nearest neighbor search grows exponentially, making brute-force approaches impractical for real-world applications.
Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) algorithms trade perfect accuracy for dramatic speed improvements. Instead of finding the exact nearest neighbors, ANN algorithms find neighbors that are "close enough" with high probability.
ANN vs Exact Search Performance
| Method | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Accuracy | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brute Force | O(N×D) | O(N×D) | 100% | Small datasets |
| k-d trees | O(log N) to O(N) | O(N×D) | 100% | Low dimensions |
| LSH | O(1) average | O(N×D) | ~90% | High dimensions |
| HNSW | O(log N) | O(N×D) | ~95-99% | High dimensions |
Key Benefits of ANN:
- Speed: 10-1000x faster than exact search
- Scalability: Handles millions of vectors efficiently
- Quality: 95-99% accuracy is sufficient for most applications
- Real-time: Sub-millisecond query response times
Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW)
The Graph-Based Revolution
HNSW, introduced by Malkov and Yashunin in 2016, revolutionized vector search by combining two powerful concepts:
- Small World Networks: Most nodes can reach any other node through a small number of hops
- Hierarchical Structure: Multiple layers with decreasing connectivity for efficient navigation
Core Algorithm Concepts
Small World Properties
Small world networks, popularized by the "six degrees of separation" concept, have two key properties:
- High clustering: Nodes form tight local clusters
- Short path lengths: Any two nodes can be connected through few intermediary nodes
Hierarchical Layer Structure
HNSW constructs multiple layers of the graph:
- Layer 0: Contains all vectors with dense local connections
- Layer 1+: Contain subsets of vectors with long-range connections
- Top Layer: Contains very few highly connected "landmark" vectors
Navigation Strategy:
- Start from the top layer with global landmarks
- Greedily navigate toward the query
- Drop to lower layers for refined local search
- Repeat until reaching the bottom layer
Construction Algorithm
def hnsw_construction_overview():
"""
HNSW graph construction process
"""
for vector in dataset:
# Determine which layers this vector belongs to
level = select_level_with_probability()
# For each layer from top to vector's level
for layer in range(top_layer, level, -1):
# Find entry points for this layer
entry_points = find_closest_in_layer(vector, layer)
# Connect to M nearest neighbors
connect_to_neighbors(vector, entry_points, M=16)
# Prune connections if necessary
prune_connections_if_needed(vector, layer)How HNSW Works with High-Dimensional Data
High-dimensional vector spaces present unique challenges that HNSW elegantly addresses:
Challenge 1: Curse of Dimensionality
- In high dimensions, all points appear equidistant
- HNSW's hierarchical structure maintains meaningful distance relationships
Challenge 2: Hub Formation
- Some vectors become over-connected "hubs"
- HNSW's bidirectional link pruning prevents hub dominance
Challenge 3: Local Minima
- Greedy search can get trapped in suboptimal regions
- Multiple entry points and layer traversal provide escape mechanisms
Performance Insight: HNSW's logarithmic search complexity O(log N) makes it practical for datasets with millions of vectors, while maintaining high recall rates (95-99%).
Distance Metrics and Similarity
Cosine Similarity
Cosine similarity measures the angle between vectors, making it ideal for high-dimensional data where magnitude is less important than direction.
import numpy as np
def cosine_similarity(a, b):
"""
Cosine similarity: cos(θ) = (a·b) / (|a|×|b|)
Range: [-1, 1] where 1 = identical, 0 = orthogonal, -1 = opposite
"""
dot_product = np.dot(a, b)
norm_a = np.linalg.norm(a)
norm_b = np.linalg.norm(b)
return dot_product / (norm_a * norm_b)
# Example usage
vec1 = [0.5, 0.3, 0.8, 0.1]
vec2 = [0.4, 0.4, 0.7, 0.2]
similarity = cosine_similarity(vec1, vec2)
# Result: 0.95 (highly similar)Why Cosine Similarity?
- Magnitude Independence: Focuses on direction, not size
- Normalisation: Always bounded between -1 and 1
- Interpretability: Easy to understand angular relationships
- Efficiency: Fast computation with dot products
Topological Similarity
Recent advances in topological data analysis have introduced topological similarity measures that capture the shape and structure of data beyond simple geometric distances.
Persistent Homology Approach:
def topological_similarity(embedding1, embedding2):
"""
Topological similarity based on persistent homology
Captures structural features that geometric distances miss
"""
# Compute persistence diagrams
pd1 = compute_persistence_diagram(embedding1)
pd2 = compute_persistence_diagram(embedding2)
# Wasserstein distance between diagrams
return wasserstein_distance(pd1, pd2)Applications:
- Protein structure comparison
- Time series analysis
- Network topology analysis
- Image shape recognition
Euclidean Distance
The most intuitive distance metric, measuring straight-line distance in vector space:
def euclidean_distance(a, b):
"""
Euclidean distance: √(Σ(a_i - b_i)²)
Sensitive to all dimensional differences
"""
return np.sqrt(np.sum((a - b) ** 2))
# L2 normalisation for fair comparison
def normalized_euclidean(a, b):
a_norm = a / np.linalg.norm(a)
b_norm = b / np.linalg.norm(b)
return euclidean_distance(a_norm, b_norm)Trade-offs:
- Pros: Intuitive, preserves magnitude information
- Cons: Sensitive to dimensionality, can be dominated by outlier dimensions
The VLQ-ADC Algorithm
Vector Quantisation Meets Asymmetric Distance Computation
The experimental VLQ-ADC (Vector Locally-adaptive Quantisation with Asymmetric Distance Computation) algorithm represents a cutting-edge approach to accelerating vector search through intelligent quantisation.
Core Innovation
VLQ-ADC combines two powerful techniques:
- Locally-adaptive quantisation: Adapts compression based on local vector distribution
- Asymmetric distance computation: Uses different representations for query and database vectors
class VLQ_ADC:
def __init__(self, n_centroids=256, n_subvectors=8):
self.n_centroids = n_centroids
self.n_subvectors = n_subvectors
self.codebooks = []
def train_quantisation(self, vectors):
"""
Train locally-adaptive quantizers for each subspace
"""
subvector_size = len(vectors[0]) // self.n_subvectors
for i in range(self.n_subvectors):
start = i * subvector_size
end = (i + 1) * subvector_size
subvectors = [v[start:end] for v in vectors]
codebook = self.learn_adaptive_codebook(subvectors)
self.codebooks.append(codebook)
def encode(self, vector):
"""
Encode vector using locally-adaptive quantisation
"""
codes = []
subvector_size = len(vector) // self.n_subvectors
for i, codebook in enumerate(self.codebooks):
start = i * subvector_size
end = (i + 1) * subvector_size
subvector = vector[start:end]
# Find closest centroid with local adaptation
code = self.find_adaptive_centroid(subvector, codebook)
codes.append(code)
return codesPerformance Characteristics
Compression Ratio: 8-32x reduction in memory usage Search Speed: 2-4x faster than traditional PQ methods Accuracy: Maintains 90-95% recall at high compression ratios
Trade-offs:
- Memory: Significant savings through quantisation
- Preprocessing: Higher computational cost during training
- Accuracy: Some loss in precision due to quantisation
- Complexity: More sophisticated than standard approaches
Experimental Results
Current research shows VLQ-ADC achieving:
- 40-60% memory reduction compared to uncompressed vectors
- 2-3x speed improvement in high-dimensional spaces
- Maintained accuracy for most practical applications
Research Status: VLQ-ADC is still experimental and not yet widely deployed in production systems. Standard HNSW with cosine similarity remains the industry standard.
Antarys HNSW Optimisation
Breaking Performance Barriers
At Antarys, we've developed a modified HNSW implementation that delivers unprecedented performance improvements:
- 1.5-2x better performance for text embeddings
- 7-8x better performance for image embeddings
These gains aren't just theoretical—they translate directly into faster AI applications and lower infrastructure costs.
The Vision: Natural Language Computing
Our optimisation stems from a fundamental belief about the future of computing:
Natural language will become the primary interface for human-computer interaction. As AI systems become more sophisticated, the bottleneck shifts from computational power to the speed of knowledge insertion and recall.
Imagine applications that can:
- Instantly understand and respond to complex queries
- Process and integrate new information in real-time
- Provide contextually relevant responses with minimal latency
- Scale to handle millions of concurrent semantic operations
This future requires vector search systems that operate at unprecedented speeds while maintaining high accuracy.
Implementation-Level Innovations
Our performance gains derive from implementation optimisations rather than algorithmic changes. The core HNSW algorithm remains mathematically sound.
class StandardHNSW:
def search(self, query_vector):
with self.write_lock: # Bottleneck: Global write lock
current_layer = self.top_layer
candidates = self.entry_points
while current_layer >= 0:
# Traverse and update metadata
candidates = self.search_layer(
query_vector, candidates, current_layer
)
current_layer -= 1
return candidatesStandardHNSW has to maintain a global execution lock to avoid data race conditions so we don't corrupt metadata, which will decrease search result quality, but our proprietary implementation allows us to carefully snapshot additional data so we don't have to apply thread lock per search traversal!
The Write Lock Challenge
In standard HNSW implementations, every graph traversal iteration requires updating metadata and maintaining thread safety. This creates a write lock bottleneck that serializes operations and dramatically reduces throughput.
Our Innovation: We've developed a novel approach that bypasses this lock mechanism while preserving search quality. The technique involves:
- Architectural fine-tuning at the data structure level
- Thread-local optimisations for parallel execution
- Metadata management that doesn't require global synchronisation
- Quality preservation through intelligent coordination patterns
Trade Secret: The specific implementation details remain proprietary, representing a significant competitive advantage in the vector database market.
Measurable Impact
Our optimisations deliver concrete benefits:
Text Embeddings (1.5-2x improvement):
- Standard: ~75 queries/second
- Optimized: ~130 queries/second
- Use cases: Semantic search, RAG systems, document similarity
Image Embeddings (7-8x improvement):
- Standard: ~12 queries/second
- Optimized: ~85 queries/second
- Use cases: Visual search, content moderation, similarity detection
System-Level Benefits:
- Lower latency: Sub-millisecond query response times
- Higher throughput: More concurrent users per server
- Reduced costs: Better resource utilisation
- Improved UX: Faster AI application response times
Technical Philosophy
Our approach balances three critical factors:
- Performance: Maximum speed for real-world workloads
- Quality: Maintained accuracy with 99%+ recall
- Simplicity: Clean APIs that developers can easily integrate
By focusing on implementation rather than algorithmic complexity, we deliver immediate benefits without requiring developers to learn new paradigms or modify existing code.
Real-World HNSW Applications
Beyond Vector Search
While HNSW is best known for powering vector databases, its applications extend far beyond traditional search scenarios:
Protein Structure Analysis
Bioinformatics Applications
- Protein folding prediction and comparison
- Drug discovery through molecular similarity
- Genetic sequence analysis and classification
- Structural biology research acceleration
Social Network Analysis
Graph Analytics at Scale
- Community detection in social networks
- Influence propagation modeling
- Recommendation system optimisation
- Network topology analysis
Audio Processing
Multimedia Applications
- Music recommendation engines
- Audio fingerprinting and identification
- Speech pattern recognition
- Sound effect matching in media production
Industrial Optimisation
Manufacturing and Logistics
- Supply chain optimisation
- Quality control pattern recognition
- Predictive maintenance modeling
- Resource allocation algorithms
Emerging Applications
Computer Vision:
- Object detection and classification
- Image similarity for creative tools
- Medical imaging analysis
- Autonomous vehicle perception
Natural Language Processing:
- Semantic search and question answering
- Document classification and clustering
- Machine translation optimisation
- Conversational AI enhancement
Financial Services:
- Fraud detection through pattern matching
- Risk assessment modeling
- Algorithmic trading strategies
- Customer behavior analysis
Scientific Computing:
- Climate modeling and analysis
- Astronomical data processing
- Materials science simulation
- Quantum computing optimisation
Industry Adoption: Major tech companies including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta rely on HNSW-based systems to power their AI applications, processing billions of vector operations daily.
The Future of Vector Search
Trends and Innovations
The vector search landscape continues to evolve rapidly:
Hardware Acceleration:
- GPU-optimized HNSW implementations
- Custom ASIC designs for vector operations
- Neuromorphic computing architectures
- Quantum-inspired algorithms
Algorithmic Advances:
- Learned index structures for vector data
- Adaptive quantisation techniques
- Multi-modal embedding spaces
- Federated vector search across distributed systems
Integration Patterns:
- Native vector search in traditional databases
- Hybrid systems combining vector and relational data
- Edge deployment for real-time applications
- Streaming vector processing pipelines
Preparing for Tomorrow
As we move toward a future where natural language becomes the primary computing interface, vector search systems must evolve to support:
- Real-time learning from user interactions
- Multi-modal understanding across text, image, audio, and video
- Contextual awareness that adapts to user intent and environment
- Scalable deployment from edge devices to massive data centers
The optimisations we've developed at Antarys represent just the beginning of this journey. By focusing on implementation-level performance improvements while maintaining algorithmic soundness, we're building the foundation for the next generation of AI-powered applications.
Conclusion
HNSW has revolutionized how we approach similarity search in high-dimensional spaces, enabling the AI applications we use every day. From semantic search to recommendation systems, from image recognition to drug discovery, HNSW powers the intelligent systems that increasingly shape our world.
The journey from understanding vector representations to optimizing graph traversals represents one of the most impactful algorithmic advances in modern computer science. As we continue pushing the boundaries of what's possible with vector search, the promise of truly intelligent, responsive AI systems comes ever closer to reality.
Key Takeaways:
- Vector search transforms any data type into geometric similarity problems
- HNSW balances speed and accuracy through hierarchical graph structures
- Implementation optimisations can deliver dramatic performance improvements
- Applications extend far beyond traditional search into virtually every domain
- The future of computing will be built on fast, accurate vector operations
Ready to experience next-generation vector search performance? Try Antarys and see the difference optimized HNSW can make in your applications.
Small Language Models and the Future of AI Infrastructure
How small language models are becoming essential for practical AI deployment, from enterprise applications to robotics, and why infrastructure like Antarys matters for this transition.
Introducing Built-in Embedding Generation
Antarys now handles the complete vector pipeline—from raw text to searchable embeddings—without external dependencies.